Scientific writing in English: Difference between revisions
From wikiluntti
 (→Pay)  | 
				|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
*  Read by QxMD  | *  Read by QxMD  | ||
*  CiteAs  | *  CiteAs  | ||
How I learnt to write research papers as a non-native English speaker https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00218-1  | |||
* Maksullinen  | |||
== Story ==  | == Story ==  | ||
| Line 40: | Line 44: | ||
https://annaclemens.com/blog/mindset-shift-write-excellent-papers-and-grant-proposal-reader/  | https://annaclemens.com/blog/mindset-shift-write-excellent-papers-and-grant-proposal-reader/  | ||
* the cover letter. "In most cases, I then understood the study’s conclusion and its significance. How come the authors couldn’t put this as well in their paper?"  | * the cover letter. "In most cases, I then understood the study’s conclusion and its significance. How come the authors couldn’t put this as well in their paper?"  | ||
* Writing a paper can feel more abstract while writing a cover letter you think about the editor.  | |||
* You need to put your reader first.  | |||
# Know your target audience  | |||
# Never use synonyms for terminology, even though it might seem dull to repeat yourself a lot,  | |||
# A clear structure. Repeat. Do not assume that something is obvious.  | |||
# Paragraphs shouldn’t be too long. Readers will only read the first (and maybe) last sentence of your paragraph.  | |||
# Stop using words such as “of course” and “obviously”: don't make your reader feel dumb.  | |||
# Abstract includes background, problem, main takeaway, results and implications  | |||
== Words ==  | == Words ==  | ||
Latest revision as of 08:20, 8 October 2024
Introduction
https://www.oacommunity.org/?t=gkaYEA8NERwJIElsRc1TCA&s=09
- Cover letters etc
 
Kielenhuolto (language planning).
https://breakingtherules.substack.com/p/a-near-perfect-picture-ep-7?t=9oMkGJLredYMz944XKcDHw&s=33
- Sampling our thoughts
- Conceptual resolution
 
 - Conceptual diffraction limit
- The written article will never be a perfect representation of the thoughts in our heads.
 
 - Conceptual sampling theorem
 
https://annaclemens.com/blog/open-science-tools-literature-search/?t=OIWr8RnZayJKHiruijdXFg&s=33
- ScienceOpen
 - The Lens
 - Citation Gecko https://citationgecko.azurewebsites.net/
 - Local Citation Network https://localcitationnetwork.github.io/
 - ResearchRabbit
 - Open Access Button
 - Unpaywall
 - EndNote Click
 - Read by QxMD
 - CiteAs
 
How I learnt to write research papers as a non-native English speaker https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00218-1
- Maksullinen
 
Story
Pay
https://annaclemens.com/blog/mindset-shift-write-excellent-papers-and-grant-proposal-reader/
- the cover letter. "In most cases, I then understood the study’s conclusion and its significance. How come the authors couldn’t put this as well in their paper?"
 - Writing a paper can feel more abstract while writing a cover letter you think about the editor.
 - You need to put your reader first.
 
- Know your target audience
 - Never use synonyms for terminology, even though it might seem dull to repeat yourself a lot,
 - A clear structure. Repeat. Do not assume that something is obvious.
 - Paragraphs shouldn’t be too long. Readers will only read the first (and maybe) last sentence of your paragraph.
 - Stop using words such as “of course” and “obviously”: don't make your reader feel dumb.
 - Abstract includes background, problem, main takeaway, results and implications
 
Words
Tuomo
Hyviä pointteja:
- Ei 
Gracious Professionalism:nvaan Gracious Professionalismin koska ei lyhenne. - eri>toinen 
Harrastuksesi on luultavasti aivan> Harrastuksesi on luultavasti aivan toinen kuin kavereillasi.erikuin kavereillasi. - erikseen 
eripuolelle> eri puolelle