Scientific writing in English: Difference between revisions
From wikiluntti
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
* Read by QxMD | * Read by QxMD | ||
* CiteAs | * CiteAs | ||
How I learnt to write research papers as a non-native English speaker https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00218-1 | |||
* Maksullinen | |||
== Story == | == Story == | ||
Line 37: | Line 41: | ||
https://www.annaclemens.com/blog/ten-most-common-mistakes-when-choosing-a-paper-title?utm_content=buffer11b09&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer&t=l4Hhvcj2xGMXC3UZJvGAGg&s=33 | https://www.annaclemens.com/blog/ten-most-common-mistakes-when-choosing-a-paper-title?utm_content=buffer11b09&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer&t=l4Hhvcj2xGMXC3UZJvGAGg&s=33 | ||
https://annaclemens.com/blog/mindset-shift-write-excellent-papers-and-grant-proposal-reader/ | |||
* the cover letter. "In most cases, I then understood the study’s conclusion and its significance. How come the authors couldn’t put this as well in their paper?" | |||
* Writing a paper can feel more abstract while writing a cover letter you think about the editor. | |||
* You need to put your reader first. | |||
# Know your target audience | |||
# Never use synonyms for terminology, even though it might seem dull to repeat yourself a lot, | |||
# A clear structure. Repeat. Do not assume that something is obvious. | |||
# Paragraphs shouldn’t be too long. Readers will only read the first (and maybe) last sentence of your paragraph. | |||
# Stop using words such as “of course” and “obviously”: don't make your reader feel dumb. | |||
# Abstract includes background, problem, main takeaway, results and implications | |||
== Words == | == Words == |
Latest revision as of 08:20, 8 October 2024
Introduction
https://www.oacommunity.org/?t=gkaYEA8NERwJIElsRc1TCA&s=09
- Cover letters etc
Kielenhuolto (language planning).
https://breakingtherules.substack.com/p/a-near-perfect-picture-ep-7?t=9oMkGJLredYMz944XKcDHw&s=33
- Sampling our thoughts
- Conceptual resolution
- Conceptual diffraction limit
- The written article will never be a perfect representation of the thoughts in our heads.
- Conceptual sampling theorem
https://annaclemens.com/blog/open-science-tools-literature-search/?t=OIWr8RnZayJKHiruijdXFg&s=33
- ScienceOpen
- The Lens
- Citation Gecko https://citationgecko.azurewebsites.net/
- Local Citation Network https://localcitationnetwork.github.io/
- ResearchRabbit
- Open Access Button
- Unpaywall
- EndNote Click
- Read by QxMD
- CiteAs
How I learnt to write research papers as a non-native English speaker https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00218-1
- Maksullinen
Story
Pay
https://annaclemens.com/blog/mindset-shift-write-excellent-papers-and-grant-proposal-reader/
- the cover letter. "In most cases, I then understood the study’s conclusion and its significance. How come the authors couldn’t put this as well in their paper?"
- Writing a paper can feel more abstract while writing a cover letter you think about the editor.
- You need to put your reader first.
- Know your target audience
- Never use synonyms for terminology, even though it might seem dull to repeat yourself a lot,
- A clear structure. Repeat. Do not assume that something is obvious.
- Paragraphs shouldn’t be too long. Readers will only read the first (and maybe) last sentence of your paragraph.
- Stop using words such as “of course” and “obviously”: don't make your reader feel dumb.
- Abstract includes background, problem, main takeaway, results and implications
Words
Tuomo
Hyviä pointteja:
- Ei
Gracious Professionalism:nvaan Gracious Professionalismin koska ei lyhenne. - eri>toinen
Harrastuksesi on luultavasti aivan> Harrastuksesi on luultavasti aivan toinen kuin kavereillasi.erikuin kavereillasi. - erikseen
eripuolelle> eri puolelle